Massacre of Tranent | |
---|---|
The memorial commemorating those who resisted British military conscription in 1797.
|
|
Location | Tranent, Haddingtonshire, Scotland, Great Britain |
Date | Tuesday, 29 August 1797 |
Target | Anti-conscription protesters |
Perpetrators | Cinque Ports Light Dragoons |
The Massacre of Tranent took place in 1797 in the town of Tranent, East Lothian, Scotland.
On 28 August, a proclamation was drawn up by local people to object to the conscription of Scots into the British Militia, to be used either for controlling their own people or for deployment elsewhere. The proclamation contained the following four clauses:-
This measure may have been encouraged or incited by the United Scotsmen, a secret society spread throughout Scotland who were believed to be intent on insurgence and the setting up of a Scottish government under Muir of Huntershill. It is believed they had been involved in similar riots and protests elsewhere over the 1797 Militia Act.
The following day, 29 August, the proclamation was handed to Major Wight, the commanding officer of the recruitment squad. This was ignored, but later, when a contingent from the local colliery communities led by 'Jackie' (Joan) Crookston confronted the troops, their response was swift and bloody. Several of the protestors, including Crookston, were shot dead out of hand.
The protestors then fled from the centre of the small town out into the countryside, only to be pursued by the Cinque Port Light Dragoons, who are reported to have cut down people indiscriminately, caring little whether they were involved in the protest or not. Casualty estimates range from around a dozen to twenty or more men, women and children dead, with more injured.
After the slaughter the troopers are alleged to have carried out rapes and pillage in the small town.
The Light Dragoons' overall commanding officer was then Colonel Viscount Hawkesbury, (later 2nd Earl of Liverpool, a future British Prime Minister) who was not present. It was reported that "His lordship was blamed for remaining at Haddington, as his presence might have prevented the outrages of the soldiery."