| Rhode Island v. Massachusetts | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Decided February 21, 1838 | |
| Full case name | The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainants v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant |
| Citations | 37 U.S. 657 (more)
9 L. Ed. 1233; 1838 U.S. LEXIS 372
|
| Holding | |
| Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over a suit by one state against another over their shared border | |
| Court membership | |
|
|
| Case opinions | |
| Dissent | Taney |
| Story took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. 657 (1838), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court asserted its original jurisdiction over a suit in equity by one state against another over their shared border. The case involved a boundary dispute between Massachusetts and Rhode Island dating back to colonial times. Daniel Webster was involved in the case representing Massachusetts.