| Author | Scott Turow |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Autobiography |
| Publisher | Farrar Straus & Giroux |
|
Publication date
|
2003 |
| Media type | Print (Hardback & Paperback) |
| Pages | 164 (paperback) |
| ISBN | (paperback) |
| OCLC | 52030296 |
| 345.73/0773 21 | |
| LC Class | KF9227.C2 T87 2003 |
| Preceded by | 'Reversible Errors' |
| Followed by | 'Ordinary Heroes' |
Ultimate Punishment: A Lawyer's Reflections on Dealing with the Death Penalty or simply Ultimate Punishment is a series of autobiographical reflections regarding the death penalty. It is written by Scott Turow and marks his return to non-fiction for the first time since One L in 1977.
Turow bases his opinions on his experiences as a prosecutor and, in his years after leaving the United States Attorney's Office in Chicago, working on behalf of death-row inmates, as well as his two years on Illinois's Commission on Capital Punishment, charged by then-Gov. George Ryan with reviewing the state's death penalty system. Turow, a self-described "death penalty agnostic," presents both sides of the death penalty debate and admits that over time he seems to change sides, depending on the argument. Turow's reflections include:
He also visits a maximum security prison and meets multiple-murderer Henry Brisbon, who, Turow says, "most closely resembles... Hannibal Lecter".
Ultimate Punishment received the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights 2004 Book award given annually to a novelist who "most faithfully and forcefully reflects Robert Kennedy's purposes - his concern for the poor and the powerless, his struggle for honest and even-handed justice, his conviction that a decent society must assure all young people a fair chance, and his faith that a free democracy can act to remedy disparities of power and opportunity."