User:Flyer22 Reborn

and .

Short story: Since many here will look at a person's without taking the time to read and comprehend it, or are simply confused by it, Boing! said Zebedee , "Just for the record, I want to confirm that Flyer 22's block log is the result of a genuine 'My brother did it' episode. I communicated with Flyer by email at the time (as did other admins), and I was convinced that she was not guilty of any abuse herself - and the block that I made was indeed to help her secure her account, as I noted in the log. In fact, none of the blocks is a result of any misbehaviour by Flyer 22."

More on the topic is stated at the bottom of

Contrary to what may be popular belief, I . And, yes, I still see Cali11298 around. Reporting him will not help unless it's necessary to report him. He will return and return. If you study his editing style, however, you should be able to spot him. For the most part, he edits the same way, except he is now being smarter.

I , and acknowledge a .

on the WP:Neutral policy are commonly clear since .

As for me considering WP:Adminship, I really do appreciate past posts on my talk page, and emails, supporting me becoming an administrator, but I am unlikely to ever accept a nomination. See for why. Also, when I see newbies and obvious WP:Sockpuppets getting elevated to adminship status, it is hard for me not to consider that the process is broken. I very much agree with Softlavender's thoughts on adminship. In other words, selecting administrators based solely on their clean block log, many edits without any regard for how those many edits were acquired, and for seemingly being drama-free is not how we should be doing things here. A clean block log, many edits and a drama-free status can be part of the process of nominating an administrator, but there should be more to it than that.

Not listed since listing them results in unwanted attention from stalkers and disgruntled editors; see what I stated above.

User:Flyer22 Reborn/Awards and gifts.

...
Wikipedia