Wikipedia:PR

To request a review, or nominate an article for a review see the instructions page. Users are limited to requesting one review at any one time, and are encouraged to help reduce the backlog by commenting on other articles. Any user may comment on a review, and there is no requirement that any comments may be acted on.

A list of all current peer reviews, with reviewer's comments included, can be found here. For easier navigation, a list of peer reviews, without the reviews themselves included, can be found here. A chronological peer reviews list can be found here.

I'm hoping to sumbit this article as a FAC in the coming months and would like to prepare it as best I can beforehand.

Thanks, Popeye191 () 07:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like it to reach GA status. I researched and rewrote the entire article and have maintained its upkeep since, and feedback would be very much appreciated. Thanks! sixtynine 16:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

The Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I is an interesting work in its own right, exemplifying the golden period of Klimt as it does. Additionally its murky provenance of being stolen from its Jewish owners by the Nazis - a fact that was covered up by the Austrian National Gallery - and the subsequent legal battle that went to the US Supreme Court, all add to the story that made this the most expensive painting ever owned at one point. This has been extensively re-written and a further review at FAC is the aim for this PR. Thank you and all the best, The Bounder () 13:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

I would really appreciate your help, PanagiotisZois () 19:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

I've listed this article for peer review because, classified as B-class, it's been half a year since the article failed GA after having been nominated, and all of the reviewer's recommendations have now been rigorously implemented. Though I did not author this article, I have done an extensive rewrite, and believe that it now meets the standard for Good Article class. In preparation for the article's renomination for GA, I would like to know if there is any way that it can be further improved. Thank you! () 20:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

...
Wikipedia